Solar Panels Threatened by Tariff Rip-off
Wednesday, 01 October 2008 21:44
COAG should support gross feed-in tariffs nationwide that pay for the full benefits of roof-top solar, rather than just the excess power after on-site consumption, the groups say.
“Only getting paid for the leftovers will discourage consumers from going solar and retard the industry,” said Jane Castle, TEC
Energy Campaigner.
“Solar panels do much more than produce zero emissions electricity. They reduce congestion on transmission lines, minimise
electricity losses along power lines and displace high-cost peak generation like gas. As these benefits aren’t compensated
elsewhere, a gross feed-in tariff brings back equity."
Brad Shone, ATA's Energy Policy Manager, says the ACT is leading the nation by aligning itself with almost 50 other schemes
around the world.
“Householders should be rewarded for the entire output of their solar panels. The Rudd Government’s solar means test combined with a net tariff will together cripple the role of solar in Australia’s energy future. Without a gross tariff, Australia will be missing out on economies of scale and market leadership,” says Mr Shone.
ATA and TEC argue that the net feed-in tariffs, adopted by Victoria, Queensland and South Australia, are sub-standard because they only pay for electricity left over after on-site usage.
Mr Shone says under ACT’s gross tariff, households will be able to pay-back the up-front costs of solar panels in around 10 years.
“By comparison, in the states with net tariffs, pay-back will take over 20 years for an average system. Net tariffs also favour larger systems and disadvantage people who spend time at home during the day like parents, senior citizens and people who work from home.”
“Solar is being treated like a boutique optional extra when it should be driving a clean, efficient energy future for Australia,” says Mr. Shone.
For interviews:
Brad Shone - ATA (Melbourne): (03) 9631 5406 / 0432 251 456
Jane Castle - TEC (Sydney): (02) 9261 3437 / 0432 287 554
